![]() On the other hand, the GeForce GTX 970 did quite a bit better, and we could take it up to 1,263MHz, which translated into a boost clock of 1,414MHz. We managed to achieve a top speed of 1,075MHz, a modest 75MHz overclock over its 1,000MHz stock speed. ![]() We didn’t expect the Radeon R9 Nano to overclock that well because of its power limitations, and that was borne out in our results. And compared to the other two AMD cards we tested here, the Nano and GeForce GTX 970 are practically sipping power. As it turns out, the Radeon R9 Nano actually consumed slightly more power at the wall outlet, which is probably to be expected given that it is still rated to draw more power than the NVIDIA card (175 watts vs. When it came to power consumption, the two cards also displayed a relatively similar performance profile. ![]() Heat is a primary concern in mini-ITX systems where cooling options and airflow are more limited, but you shouldn’t have an issue with either of these cards. In the temperature department, both the Radeon R9 Nano and GeForce GTX 970 returned very similar results, with the Hawaii-based Radeon R9 390X serving to highlight how cool these cards really are. Temperature, Power Consumption & Overclocking Temperature and Power Consumption
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |